From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Cecil Canton Public Schools

School Board badge.png

Elkton, Maryland
District details
Superintendent: Jeffrey Lawson
# of school board members: 5
Website: Link

Cecil Canton Public Schools is a schoolhouse district in Maryland.

Click on the links below to acquire more virtually the school district'south...

  • Superintendent
  • School board
  • Elections
  • Upkeep
  • Teacher salaries
  • Academic functioning
  • Student enrollment
  • Demographics
  • Contact information

Superintendent

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png

This information is updated as we become enlightened of changes. Please contact u.s. with any updates.

Jeffrey Lawson is the superintendent of Cecil County Public Schools. Lawson was appointed superintendent on May 14, 2018. Lawson'south previous career experience includes working every bit the commune's executive director of loftier schoolhouse educational activity and acquaintance superintendent of education services.[1]

School board elections

The Cecil Canton Board of Education consists of five members elected to four-yr terms. Each member is elected to a specific geographic commune.

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png

This officer information was concluding updated on March xxx, 2022. Delight contact us with whatsoever updates.

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png

Election dates

Come across as well: Cecil County Public Schools elections in 2018, 2020, and 2022

Members of the board are elected to four-year terms on a staggered footing. Elections are held in fifty-fifty-numbered years.

A general election is scheduled for November 8, 2022. A chief ballot is scheduled for July 19, 2022.

Public participation in board meetings

The Cecil County Public Schools school lath maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[two]

"

GUIDELINES FOR CITIZENS' PARTICIPATION

  • A timeline for presentations will be established by the Board President. In full general, a maximum of xxx minutes volition exist reserved for public comments. Five minutes will be allotted to individuals. 7 minutes volition be allotted to a person speaking on behalf of a group. Speakers may non yield their time to someone else. When the allotted time expires, the speaker will be then brash merely will be permitted to complete a sentence. If more people wish to speak than the time allows, public comment may continue at the discretion of the Lath.
  • The Board will decide the appropriateness of the subject field matter. Personnel matters, awaiting appeals, employee negotiations, and specific pupil disciplinary matters may non be discussed. These matters volition be referred to the assistants for proper handling. The Board sits every bit an appellate body in both student and employee appeals. The Board cannot annotate on or have prior knowledge of a case that would influence their ability to deliberate. To maintain the power of the Board to render a fair and unbiased decision, comments regarding private student or personnel problems cannot be presented during public comment.
  • Subject matter must be limited to issues, without reference to personalities. Rude, slanderous, or threatening remarks are out of order.
  • Presentations will exist in consonance with good sense of taste and decorum conforming the occasion and dignity of the Board meeting. A person attending a Board meeting may not engage in any behave, including visual demonstrations such as the waving of placards, signs, or banners, that disrupts the session or that interferes with the correct of members of the public to attend and observe the session. The Board President may social club any person who persists in such comport to exist removed.
  • The Board encourages speakers to submit a written re-create of their remarks.
  • Speakers will be required to complete the sign-in sheet, providing their name, contact data, and the topic(s) they wish to talk over.
  • The Lath reserves the correct to modify these guidelines for good cause, as determined past them.[3]
"

Upkeep

From 1993 to 2013, the Cecil County school district had an average of $152,568,333 in revenue and $150,812,524 in expenditures, according to the U.s. Census Bureau's survey of schoolhouse system finances. The commune had a yearly average of $47,660,381 in outstanding debt. The commune retired $3,141,762 of its debt and issued $v,544,143 in new debt each year on average.[iv]

Revenue

The table below separates the district'southward revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.

Revenue past Source
Fiscal
Year
Local State Federal Revenue Total
Total % of Acquirement Full % of Acquirement Total % of Revenue
2010 $90,709,000 41.35% $112,653,000 51.36% $15,999,000 7.29% $219,361,000
2011 $87,844,000 40.12% $110,329,000 50.39% $xx,775,000 9.49% $218,948,000
2012 $81,498,000 38.84% $114,337,000 54.49% $13,993,000 6.67% $209,828,000
2013 $83,810,000 39.71% $113,497,000 53.78% $13,731,000 6.51% $211,038,000
Avg. $67,744,381 45.02% $76,044,952 49.50% $8,779,000 5.47% $152,568,333

Expenditures

The table beneath separates the commune'southward expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:

  • Instruction: functioning expenditures, state payments on behalf of the commune for instruction and benefits, and retirement organisation transfers
  • Support Services: support services, nutrient services, and retirement system transfers for back up service staff
  • Uppercase Spending: capital outlay expenditures (i.e., construction, land or facilities purchases, and equipment purchases)
  • Debt & Gov. Payments: payments to state and local governments and interest on schoolhouse organization debt
  • Other: all other non-K-12 programs, except food services
Expenditures past Category
Fiscal
Yr
Pedagogy Support Services Capital Spending Debt & Gov. Payments Other Budget
Total
Total % of Budget Total % of Upkeep Total % of Budget Total % of Budget Total % of Budget
2010 $119,726,000 55.12% $71,463,000 32.90% $xiii,416,000 6.18% $5,677,000 ii.61% $6,937,000 3.19% $217,219,000
2011 $119,965,000 56.75% $71,747,000 33.94% $9,376,000 four.44% $3,359,000 1.59% $six,950,000 three.29% $211,397,000
2012 $119,133,000 59.24% $69,548,000 34.59% $five,809,000 2.89% $2,599,000 ane.29% $3,999,000 1.99% $201,088,000
2013 $121,622,000 58.37% $73,181,000 35.12% $seven,185,000 3.45% $2,595,000 i.25% $3,774,000 i.81% $208,357,000
Avg. $81,959,333 54.30% $49,440,762 32.76% $12,245,952 8.28% $2,301,524 one.46% $4,864,952 3.21% $150,812,524

Debt

The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.

Debt
Financial
Year
Retired Issued Outstanding
2010 $5,677,000 $2,078,000 $81,285,000
2011 $5,684,000 $0 $75,601,000
2012 $6,346,000 $220,000 $69,474,000
2013 $five,279,000 $717,000 $64,912,000
Avg. $three,141,762 $5,544,143 $47,660,381

Teacher salaries

The post-obit salary data was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may non reverberate actual teacher salaries in the district.

Yr Minimum Maximum
2020-2021[5] $49,245 $97,463

Academic performance

Proficiency assessments

Each year, state and local education agencies utilise tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the information beneath was published by the U.S. Section of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a issue, proficiency levels are non comparable between different states and yr-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable considering states may modify their proficiency measurements.[half dozen]

Mathematics

The following table shows the percentage of commune students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[vii]

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)
Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native
American (%)
Two or More
Races (%)
White (%)
2018-2019 36 55-59 eighteen 22 21-39 32 39
2017-2018 N/A[8] Due north/A[9] Due north/A[10] N/A[eleven] N/A[12] N/A[13] N/A[14]
2016-2017 41 65-69 22 28 40-59 37 45
2015-2016 37 sixty-64 20 22 twoscore-59 34 40
2014-2015 36 55-59 23 21 21-39 31 38
2013-2014 70 85-89 50 58 ≥lxxx 64 73
2012-2013 75 85-89 56 64 ≥fourscore 71 77
2011-2012 84 ≥95 72 81 ≥lxxx 82 86
2010-2011 81 90-94 66 75 60-79 82 83

Reading/language arts

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or higher up the proficiency level each school year:[vii]

Schoolhouse yr All (%) Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)
Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native
American (%)
Two or More
Races (%)
White (%)
2018-2019 45 60-64 26 33 xl-59 38 49
2017-2018 N/A[xv] N/A[16] N/A[17] Northward/A[18] N/A[nineteen] N/A[20] North/A[21]
2016-2017 39 fifty-54 20 30 40-59 37 42
2015-2016 36 50-54 21 25 forty-59 34 39
2014-2015 36 50-54 23 22 40-59 31 39
2013-2014 79 85-89 64 lxx threescore-79 75 82
2012-2013 83 90-94 69 74 ≥80 81 85
2011-2012 85 90-94 74 84 ≥80 85 86
2010-2011 85 ≥95 76 79 60-79 85 87

Graduation rates

The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[7] [22]

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific
Islander (%)
Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native
American (%)
Two or More
Races (%)
White (%)
2017-2018 91 GE50 85-89 80-84 PS GE90 92
2016-2017 91 GE50 85-89 85-89 PS GE90 91
2015-2016 91 GE50 85-89 85-89 PS 85-89 92
2014-2015 88 GE80 80-84 lxxx-89 eighty-89 88
2013-2014 89 GE50 85-89 lxxx-89 PS GE90 89
2012-2013 87 GE50 80-84 80-89 PS fourscore-89 87
2011-2012 84 GE50 eighty-84 80-89 PS fourscore-89 84
2010-2011 83 GE50 75-79 80-89 PS GE80 83

Student enrollment

Year[23] Enrollment Yr-to-twelvemonth change (%)
2018-2019 15,307 -0.four
2017-2018 xv,364 -ane.7
2016-2017 fifteen,633 -1.four
2015-2016 15,859 ane.1
2014-2015 15,681 -0.9
2013-2014 fifteen,824 i.2
2012-2013 15,634 -1.ii
2011-2012 fifteen,827 -0.vii
2010-2011 fifteen,937 -1.7
2009-2010 16,205 0.0
2008-2009 16,209 -0.5
2007-2008 sixteen,290 -0.8
2006-2007 16,421 -0.six
2005-2006 16,521 -0.one
2004-2005 16,535 0.4
2003-2004 16,475 1.7
2002-2003 16,203 0.7
2001-2002 16,095 i.two
2000-2001 fifteen,905 1.4
1999-2000 xv,680 0.8
1998-1999 15,550 one.five
1997-1998 15,327 2.9
1996-1997 14,897 1.eight
1995-1996 xiv,640 2.7
1994-1995 fourteen,258 3.3
1993-1994 13,809 i.8
1992-1993 13,565 two.3
1991-1992 13,255 3.0
1990-1991 12,868 ii.2
1989-1990 12,587 0.eight
1988-1989 12,490 two.3
1987-1988 12,208 0.3
1986-1987 12,169 -

About the commune

Cecil Canton Public Schools is located in Cecil County, Maryland.

Cecil County Public Schools is located in Cecil County, Maryland. Information technology is classified as a rural school district by the National Center for Didactics Statistics. The commune served 15,307 students during the 2018-2019 schoolhouse year and comprised 29 schools.[24]


During the 2018-2019 school twelvemonth, 44.0% of the district's students were eligible for gratuitous or reduced-price lunch, two.0% were English language learners, and 15.7% of students had an Private Education Plan (IEP).[25]

Racial Demographics, 2018-2019
Race Cecil County Public Schools (%) Maryland K-12 students (%)
American Indian/Alaska Native N/A 0.iii
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander 0.7 6.6
Black 9.5 33.vi
Hispanic vii.two 18.1
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Northward/A 0.1
Ii or More Races half-dozen.two 4.7
White 76.0 36.v

Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may exist selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census hither.

Contact information

CecilCountyPublic SchoolsLogo2.jpg
Cecil County Public Schools
201 Booth St.
Elkton, Doc 21921
Phone: 410-996-5400

Meet also

Maryland School Board Elections News and Analysis

Seal of Maryland.png

School Board badge.png

Ballotpedia RSS.jpg

  • List of school districts in Maryland
  • Public didactics in Maryland
  • Maryland school board elections, 2022
  • Assay of spending in America'south largest school districts
  • United States school shootings, 1990-nowadays

External links

  • Search Google News for this topic
  • Cecil County Public Schools
  • Maryland Association of Boards of Didactics
  • Maryland Land Department of Educational activity

Footnotes

  1. Cecil County Public Schools, "Superintendent," accessed October 29, 2019
  2. Cecil County Public Schools, "Coming together Format & Denizen Participation," accessed March thirty, 2021
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Whatever inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  4. United States Census Agency, "Public Schoolhouse Organization Finances: Historical Data," accessed December 1, 2015
  5. Cecil County Public Schools, "10 MONTH Instructor Salary SCHEDULE Commodity XXXVI JULY one, 2020 - JUNE thirty, 2021," accessed March 30, 2021
  6. U.S. Section of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "Country Assessments in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics- School Year 2018-xix EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed February 25, 2021
  7. seven.0 vii.1 7.two To protect student privacy, percentages were reported every bit ranges for groups of 300 students or fewer. If five (v) or fewer students were included in a data set, the information was replaced by "PS."
  8. Maryland did non submit information past the final due engagement, according to the U.S. Department of Education's data documentation.
  9. Maryland did non submit data by the concluding due date, co-ordinate to the U.S. Section of Didactics's information documentation.
  10. Maryland did not submit data past the terminal due date, according to the U.Due south. Department of Educational activity'south data documentation.
  11. Maryland did not submit information by the concluding due date, according to the U.S. Department of Education'southward data documentation.
  12. Maryland did not submit information by the terminal due date, according to the U.S. Department of Education's data documentation.
  13. Maryland did not submit data past the last due date, according to the U.S. Section of Education'southward data documentation.
  14. Maryland did not submit data by the final due engagement, co-ordinate to the U.S. Department of Education's data documentation.
  15. Maryland did not submit data by the last due appointment, according to the U.South. Section of Education's data documentation.
  16. Maryland did not submit information past the final due engagement, according to the U.S. Section of Education's information documentation.
  17. Maryland did not submit data by the final due date, according to the U.S. Department of Education'south data documentation.
  18. Maryland did not submit data by the concluding due date, according to the U.S. Department of Didactics's data documentation.
  19. Maryland did not submit data by the last due engagement, according to the U.S. Department of Education's information documentation.
  20. Maryland did not submit data by the final due engagement, co-ordinate to the U.South. Department of Instruction's data documentation.
  21. Maryland did not submit information by the final due date, according to the U.Southward. Department of Pedagogy's data documentation.
  22. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: EDFacts, "Four-Year Adjusted-Cohort Graduation Rates - School Twelvemonth 2017-18 EDFacts Data Documentation," accessed Feb 25, 2021
  23. National Center for Teaching Statistics, "ElSi tableGenerator," accessed March eight, 2021
  24. National Center for Pedagogy Statistics, "Search for Public School Districts," accessed March 8, 2021
  25. National Center for Education Statistics, "Public Simple/Secondary Schoolhouse Universe Survey," accessed March 8, 2021